Sussex Squash
Online League Management System 2019/2020 Season
League Rules
Sussex Business League Section
Sussex Business League

[Main] [Fixtures]
 

i-MASK advanced visor protection system for Squash. Can be worn over glasses and does not mist or restrict vision.
 
Bennet Christmas
Club Address Post Code Google Map
Download VCard
Telephone Fax
Website Email Bennet Christmas
Club Fixtures Secretary Email
Sussex Business League Fixtures Secretary Mark Bennett Email

Division 4 - Bennett Christmas (1) versus Dotsquares Games (1) played on 23-Sep-2019 at 19:35

String Home Team Player Ranking Grading Away Team Player Ranking Grading Score Result
1 Mike Harford Squash Levels for Mike  Harford 2 (2) 1700 Keith Waters Squash Levels for Keith  Waters 1 (1) 4335 15-6 16-14 10-15 15-12 3-1
2 Greg G Fenn Squash Levels for Greg G Fenn 3 (3) 3634 Mark Newson Squash Levels for Mark  Newson 3 (3) 3835 10-15 13-15 15-8 10-15 1-3
3 David Porter Squash Levels for David  Porter 4 (4) 1655 Pujan Soni Squash Levels for Pujan  Soni 7 (7) 1890 5-15 12-15 7-15 0-3
4 Rob Carpenter Squash Levels for Rob  Carpenter 8 (8) 1529 Bill Baxter Squash Levels for Bill  Baxter 8 (8) 2863 7-15 6-15 7-15 0-3
5 Squash Levels for 0 (0) 0 Squash Levels for 0 (0) 0 Walker Over A 0-3
(U) - Unranked at time of match Home Team Away Team
Bennett Christmas Lost to Dotsquares Games by Strings
1 4
Games
4 13
Win Bonus
0 3
League Organiser Adjustment
0 0
Points
4 16

Match Report Press Report

Bennett Christmas Lost to Dotsquares Games.

With the away team having higher Gradings in 4 of the strings, Home advantage looked to be needed to take the win. The stats turned out to be correct, with a fine Away win.

It was the number 1 String which turned out to be the most competitive, with the Players battling out over a total of 103 Points ! Victory finally going to the Home Player, Mike Harford.

Player of the tie was the Home No. 1 string, Mike Harford, gaining 100 Ranking Points from the match.

If the Home No. 5 player, , had not had to withdraw after 0 game(s) the result could have been closer.